Over the weekend, Sen. Kamala Harris (D–Calif.) unveiled a plan for “reducing the opportunity gap” between African Americans and the remainder of the country. It included several provisions, but one part in particular drew the most attention: She promised to “establish a student loan debt forgiveness program for Pell grant recipients who start a business that operates for three years in disadvantaged communities.” Beneficiaries could receive up to $20,000 in debt forgiveness and could defer debt without interest during a “business-formation period” of three years or less.
The provision is so ridiculously specific that it’s hard to tell who exactly would benefit from it at all. Students who qualify for Pell grants hail from low-income households: They likely have little capital to begin with, which would certainly impede a successful small business. Harris says she’ll also establish a $12 billion fund to assist minority small business owners, but that $12 billion will likely be for naught—at least when it comes to fulfilling Harris’ requirements for help with student debt. About 80 percent of small businesses fail within the first year and a half, and even fewer make it to Harris’ three-year minimum. And her plan is supposed to be for businesses operating in disadvantaged communities. They face a much tougher entrepreneurial landscape and a subsequent decreased chance of success.
Other elements of Harris’ plan include a $60 billion investment in STEM education at historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs). The proposal in total costs $84.5 billion, with additional capital set aside for a $10 billion investment in the State Small Business Credit Initiative and another $2.5 billion “to support HBCU programs that will generate Black teachers.” How she plans to pay for it is unclear, but an aide has intimated that she will close tax loopholes and raise levies on the wealthy and Wall Street.
Harris’ plan comes amidst a slew of other confusing policy statements. On a number of occasions, the senator has flip-flopped on whether or not she wants to eliminate private health insurance. And during a recent appearance on The View, she initially told the panel that she did not support decriminalizing illegal border crossings—a backtrack from her debate performance—only to immediately reverse course in the same sentence.
“I’m not in favor of decriminalizing or not having consequence for, let me be very clear, we have to have a secure border, but I am in favor of saying that we’re not going to treat people who are undocumented cross the border as criminals, that is correct, that is correct,” Harris said.
In that vein, her opportunity gap proposal is the latest in a string of would-be policies mired in doubt and disarray, perhaps because Harris herself doesn’t quite know yet where she falls. The senator is trying to pull off a high-flying balancing act, one where she tries to appeal to everyone by standing for everything. The end result looks more like standing for nothing.
Founded in 1968, Reason is the magazine of free minds and free markets. We produce hard-hitting independent journalism on civil liberties, politics, technology, culture, policy, and commerce. Reason exists outside of the left/right echo chamber. Our goal is to deliver fresh, unbiased information and insights to our readers, viewers, and listeners every day. Visit https://reason.com
This post has been republished with implied permission from a publicly-available RSS feed found on Reason. The views expressed by the original author(s) do not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of The Libertarian Hub, its owners or administrators. Any images included in the original article belong to and are the sole responsibility of the original author/website. The Libertarian Hub makes no claims of ownership of any imported photos/images and shall not be held liable for any unintended copyright infringement. Submit a DCMA takedown request.