Hong Kong Dissidents Win One Demand—Now There’s Four More to Go

Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!
Fight Censorship, Share This Post!

Earlier today, Hong Kong’s Chief Executive Carrie Lam withdrew the controversial extradition bill that set off protests 13 weeks ago.

The bill would have allowed Hong Kong to extradite suspected criminals to both Taiwan and mainland China. Since 1997, Hong Kong has technically been considered part of China, but was granted significant autonomy through the “one country, two systems” policy, which allows Hongkongers to enjoy basic democratic freedoms. The extradition bill, which was tabled several months ago but not formally withdrawn until now, would have winnowed away at Hong Kong’s autonomy.

Though full withdrawal of the extradition bill is a genuine concession, Lam’s decision fulfilled only one of the protesters’ demands and many pro-democracy dissidents warn that this is not a full victory, but partial appeasement.

The protesters still want the Hong Kong government to address the increasing use of force by police and the lack of free and fair elections. They also want Hong Kong to release people who have been arrested in connection with the protests, and for Lam, who the protesters see as a puppet of Beijing, to step down.



The protesters’ additional demands—notably the calls for fully free and democratic elections—were at the core of the 2014 “umbrella movement” protests. Yet Lam is still in charge and candidates for chief executive are still pre-screened and approved by mainland China.

The conflict over mainland China’s influence on Hong Kong will pop up again in the future, particularly since Hong Kong’s semi-autonomy rests on a 50-year-long treaty that expires in 2047.



“Incidents over these past two months have shocked and saddened Hong Kong people,”  Lam said in a broadcast. “We are all very anxious about Hong Kong, our home. We all hope to find a way out of the current impasse and unsettling times.”

More Reason coverage of the Hong Kong protests here.

This post has been republished with implied permission from a publicly-available RSS feed found on Reason. The views expressed by the original author(s) do not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of The Libertarian Hub, its owners or administrators. Any images included in the original article belong to and are the sole responsibility of the original author/website. The Libertarian Hub makes no claims of ownership of any imported photos/images and shall not be held liable for any unintended copyright infringement. Submit a DCMA takedown request.

Fight Censorship, Share This Post!

Read the original article.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.