Select Page

Dems Promise To Close Gitmo. Again.

President Barack Obama signed an executive order to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay on the first day of his presidency. Over a decade later, at tonight’s debate, the candidates looking to become the next Democratic presidential nominee were asked whether they would also commit to close the facility.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) was an unequivocal “yes.”

“It’s time to close this detention facility. It not only costs us money, it’s an international embarrassment,” said Warren. “We have to be an America that lives our values every day.”

Former Vice President Joe Biden deflected when asked about closing the U.S. facility there.

“You have to have congressional authority to do it,” said Biden, as an explanation for why the Obama-Biden administration couldn’t get the job done. He conceded it was “an advertisement for creating terror” but then quickly pivoted to his thoughts on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The answer is classic Biden, a politician who—as Reason‘s Eric Boehm has reported—is eager to embrace any politically-convenient middle ground, regardless of how damaging that middle ground might be to civil liberties.

It is true that Congress has passed, and Obama had signed, legislation barring the transfer of Guantanamo detainees to the U.S. for trial. That legislation itself might be an unconstitutional restriction on the president’s authority, the logic being that the president, as commander in chief, has the power to transfer military detainees at Guantanamo wherever he might wish.

That Biden was so quick to wave away questions about closing the facility—which still holds some 40 detainees, and requires expensive infrastructure fixes to keep it habitable—suggests that he wouldn’t be so eager to push for congressional approval of closing Guantanamo if elected.

Indeed, the fact that tonight’s debate moderators asked only Warren and Biden about Guantanamo Bay before moving on to other issues suggests that debate watchers and voters don’t care all that much about shutting down one of the worst excesses of the still-ongoing war on terror.

This post has been republished with permission from a publicly-available RSS feed found on Reason. The views expressed by the original author(s) do not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of The Libertarian Hub, its owners or administrators. Any images included in the original article belong to and are the sole responsibility of the original author/website. The Libertarian Hub makes no claims of ownership of any imported photos/images and shall not be held liable for any unintended copyright infringement. Submit a DCMA takedown request.

-> Click Here to Read the Original Article <-

About The Author

Christian Britschgi

Founded in 1968, Reason is the magazine of free minds and free markets. We produce hard-hitting independent journalism on civil liberties, politics, technology, culture, policy, and commerce. Reason exists outside of the left/right echo chamber. Our goal is to deliver fresh, unbiased information and insights to our readers, viewers, and listeners every day. Visit

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Bringing together a variety of news and information from some of today’s most important libertarian thought leaders. All feeds are checked and refreshed every hour and pages auto-refresh every 15 minutes. External images are deleted after 30 days.

Time since last refresh: 0 second

Publish Your Own Article

Follow The Libertarian Hub


Support Our Work

Support the Libertarian Hub by tipping with Bitcoin!

Weekly Newsletter

Newsletter Signup

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive a weekly email report of the top five most popular articles on the Libertarian Hub!

Weekly Newsletter SignupTop 5 Stories of the Week

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive a weekly email report of the top five most popular articles on the Libertarian Hub!