The Absurdity of Covid ‘Cases’

Fight Censorship, Share This Post!

test

Yesterday’s headlines announcedĀ Donald and Melania Trump “tested positive” for covid-19. Another claims nineteen thousand Amazon workers “got” covid-19 on the job. Both of these pseudostoriesĀ are sure to ignite another absurd media frenzy.Ā 

As always, the story keeps changing: Remember ventilators, flatten the curve, the next two weeks are crucial, etc.? Remember Nancy Pelosi in Chinatown back in February, urging everyone to visit? Remember Fauci dismissing masks as useless? Why should we believe anything the political/media complex tells us now?

So what do these headlines really mean? What exactlyĀ is a covidĀ “case”?Ā 

Since the beginning of the coronavirus outbreak, most US media outlets have been exceedingly credulous and complicit in their reporting. Journalists almost uniformly promote what we can call the “prolockdown” narrative, which is to wildly exaggerate the risks from covid-19 to serve a political agenda. They may be motivated to hurt Trump politically, to promote a more socialist “new normal,” or simply to drive more clicks and views. Bad news sells. But the bias is clear and undeniable.Ā 

This explains why media outlets use the terms “case” and “infection” so loosely, to the point of actively misinforming the public. All of the endless talk about testing, testing, testing served to obscure two important facts. First, the tests themselves are almost laughablyĀ unreliable in producing both false positives and negatives. And what is the point? Are we going to test people again and again, every time they go out to the grocery or bump into a neighbor? Second, detecting virus particles or droplets in a human’s respiratory tract tells us very little. It certainly does not tell us they are sick, or transmitting sickness to anyone.Ā 

Take a perfectly healthy person with no particular symptoms and swab the inside of their nose. If the culture shows the presence ofĀ staphylococcus aureus, do we insist they have a staph infection?Ā When someone drives to work without incident or accident, do we create statisticsĀ about their exposure to traffic?

ā€”A virus is not a disease. Only a very small percentage of those exposed to the virus itselfā€”SARS-CoV-2ā€”show any kind of acute respiratory symptoms, or what we can call “coronavirus disease.”Ā 

The only meaningful statistics show the incidence of serious illness, hospitalizations, and deaths. The single most important statistic among these is the infection fatality rate (IFR). Data collected through JulyĀ showsĀ that the IFR for those under age forty-five is actuallyĀ lowerĀ than that of the common flu. The covid-19 IFR rises for those over fifty, but it is hardly a death sentence. And the data does not segregate those with preexisting health issues causedĀ by obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. If we could see data only for reasonably healthy people under fifty, the numbers would be even more reassuring.Ā 

Mild or asymptomatic covidĀ cases are effectively meaningless. The world is full of bacteria and viruses, and sometimes they make us a bit sick for a few days. There are millions of themĀ in the world all around us, on our skin, in our noseĀ and respiratory tract, in our organs. We are meant to live with them, which is why we all have immune systems designed to help us coexist and adapt to ever-changing organisms. We develop antibodies naturally, or we attempt to stimulate them through vaccines, but ultimately our own immune systemsĀ have to deal with covid-19. The virus will always be out there waiting, on the other side of any lockdown or maskā€”so we might as well get on with it.Ā 

From day one the focus should have been on boosting immunity through exercise, fresh air, sunlight, proper dietary supplementation, and the promotion of general well-being. Instead our politicians, bureaucrats, and media insisted on business lockdowns, school closures, distancing, isolation, masks, and the mirage of a fast, effective vaccine. As with almost everything in life, state intervention made the situation worse. We can only hope manyĀ governors are removed from office, either by impeachment or at the next election. Several, including Andrew Cuomo in New York and Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan, should face criminal charges for their lawless edicts. There is no due process exception for “public health.”

Lockdowns were never justified, either in terms of the covid-19 risk or the staggering economicĀ tradeoffs, which will be felt for decades. They certainly are not justifiedĀ now, given sevenĀ months of additional data showing that the transmission and lethality of covid-19 are not particularly worse than previous SARS, swine flu, orĀ Ebola pandemics. We still don’t know how many of the reported two hundred thousand US covid-19 deaths wereĀ actually causedĀ by theĀ SARS-CoV-2 respiratory disease,Ā orĀ simply reflect people who died of other causes after exposure to covid-19. We do know that the harms caused by the lockdowns far outweigh the harms posed by the covid-19 virus.

We have had nearly eight months of life and liberty stolenĀ from us by politicians and their hysteria-promoting accomplices in media. How much more will we accept?

Reprinted with permission from Mises.org.


Fight Censorship, Share This Post!

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.