What Next? Spear Control?

For people who still have fears about the threat of a violent takeover of the federal government, a ruling by Washington, D.C., federal Judge Royce C. Lamberth has gone a long way to relieve such fears. In a decision denying bail to one of the January 6 protestors, Jacob Anthony Chansley, who is often referred to as the “QAnon Shaman,” Lamberth no doubt succeeded in calming the fears of Washington lawmakers and members of the mainstream press who remain convinced that there was a serious danger posed by the January 6 “insurrectionists,” “revolutionaries,” “insurgents,” “rebels,” “terrorists,” “traitors,” “overthrowers,” and “rioters” who were supposedly attempting to violently take over the reins of the federal government.

One of the most fascinating aspects of this phenomenon is the weapon that Chansley chose to lead the charge to take over the Capitol. He used a spear, a weapon so dangerous that Lamberth cited it as one of the principal reasons that he was denying pretrial bail to Chansley.

A spear? Yes, a spear! What could be more dangerous than that? No, don’t say an AR-15 or a Glock 19. Those weapons run the risk of malfunctioning or misfiring. Moreover, unless a person is highly trained in the use of firearms, one runs the definite risk of missing the target when firing.

A spear is obviously a much more effective weapon to employ when trying to violently overthrow a government. A spear doesn’t lock up and misfire. And it’s virtually impossible to miss with a spear. Moreover, its history as a weapon goes back a lot further than the history of guns.

Good for Lamberth in understanding the gravity of the threat that Chansley posed to America and continues to pose to America with his spear. Good for him for keeping him in jail pending his trial. Why let that pesky bail requirement in the Bill of Rights endanger the American people with the possibility of more spear attacks?

In fact, what I found surprising about Lamberth’s decision is that he seems to have failed to note a much more dangerous weapon that Chansley was using during his attempt to conquer the U.S. government. Horns. Yes, horns! He’s the guy who had his  face covered with war paint (which is scary in and of itself) and was wearing bull horns on his head.

Just think what he could have done. He could have simply lowered his head and charged members of Congress, Capitol guards, and National Guard troops with his horns. Just think how many bullfighters have been hurt or even killed in the bullring in that way? How could Lamberth have missed the grave danger posed by Chansley’s horns?

In any event, thank goodness for our federal judiciary in our nation’s capital. Thank goodness they are keeping us safe by keeping people in jail pending the outcome of their trial.

The post What Next? Spear Control? appeared first on The Future of Freedom Foundation.


This post has been republished with permission from a publicly-available RSS feed found on The Future of Freedom Foundation. The views expressed by the original author(s) do not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of The Libertarian Hub, its owners or administrators. Any images included in the original article belong to and are the sole responsibility of the original author/website. The Libertarian Hub makes no claims of ownership of any imported photos/images and shall not be held liable for any unintended copyright infringement. Submit a DCMA takedown request.

-> Click Here to Read the Original Article <-

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Weekly Newsletter SignupTop 5 Stories of the Week

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive a weekly email report of the top five most popular articles on the Libertarian Hub!