NJ Student Faces Potential Punishment After Using Trump Background On Zoom?

Authored by Ben Zeisloft via Campus Reform,

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) sent Stockton University a letter, expressing concern that the university may have disciplined a student after he used a photo of President Donald Trump as his Zoom background in one of his online courses.

According to FIRE’s letter, Stockton University doctoral student Robert Dailyda utilized the Trump background during a class held via Zoom on July 1. There was no evidence that the Zoom background affected classroom order, according to the letter.

However, later that day, students criticized Dailyda’s background in a private GroupMe chat, FIRE claims.

Dailyda removed himself from the chat and expressed his disappointment on Facebook.

“I am done with the leftist agenda of BLM and the white self haters,” Dailyda said, according to FIRE.

“I have seen it in action in my doctoral classes at Stockton and the general media. I’m not backing down. If we can’t get past this, ok, I’m ready to fight to the death for our country and against those that want to take it down.” 

In a separate Facebook post, Dailyda said his initial post was “an outpouring from my heart and meant to be patriotic.”

But on July 3, university police contacted Dailyda, informing him they had received a report claiming he made threatening statements, FIRE said.

Dailyda met with two members of Stockton’s Care and Community Standards Office on July 10. The letter alleged that they informed Dailyda that students were offended by his Zoom background and Facebook post, and that the two university employees asked him to explain his political views. The letter then said that  on July 16, Stockton charged Dailyda with violating the Disruptive Behavior, Discrimination, Harassment, Hostile Environment, and Harm provisions of its campus code.

FIRE’s letter expressed concern that Dailyda’s First Amendment rights were violated. 

“While a university has a critical interest in ensuring that classroom discussions are not substantially and materially interrupted, that interest does not justify punishing a student for non-disruptive expression, even when it occurs in the classroom context,” FIRE said.

Referring to the Supreme Court’s 1969 ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines, which addressed the First Amendment rights of students, FIRE called on Stockton to rescind the charges against Dailyda by August 11.

According to FIRE, Dailyda had until Friday to contest the charges, which he is doing by sending the college FIRE’s letter.

The letter states that a university employee informed Dailyda during a pre-trial hearing that he could face up to a “[s]uspension, $50 fine, community service project, social justice workshop, and decision making workshop” if he is found to be in violation of the student code.

Stockton University did not respond to Campus Reform‘s request for comment in time for publication.

“I’m frankly confused except for knowing that my views are in conflict with the Stockton Social justice agenda. They are figuratively putting their knee on my neck. Stockton University has become a joke in my opinion,” Dailyda wrote on Facebook.

“As a student in their organizational leadership. doctoral program, I see a downward spiral over the last 2 years as the core professors have left…I’ll likely face additional sanctions for this in addition to those I am currently facing for also speaking my mind about BLM. Unbelievable!” he added. “This University does not support open dialog and has a strong bias against conservatives. It should not be publicly funded.”