Virtually every time I protest an unconstitutional act by the federal government, I’m told that there was no choice. That act was “necessary.” William Pitt had a pretty harsh view of this “necessity” argument.
When government people tell you something is “necessary” it usually means they just want more power and control.@mmaharrey10th#truth #liberty #constitution #10thAmendment pic.twitter.com/wUvXZHI3cZ
— TenthAmendmentCenter (@TenthAmendment) December 15, 2020
For Further Reading
The First Question We Should Always Ask
Is a Presidential “State of Emergency” Constitutional?
The post Necessity! The Argument of Tyrants first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center Blog.
The Tenth Amendment Center works to preserve and protect Tenth Amendment freedoms through information and education. The center serves as a forum for the study and exploration of state and individual sovereignty issues, focusing primarily on the decentralization of federal government power. Visit https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/