Continuing his warnings about the power of the federal judiciary, Brutus not only opposes appellate jurisdiction as one of the “most objectionable parts” of the Constitution, but raises additional concerns that are extremely similar to what ended up in the 5th and 6th Amendments.
Path to Liberty: November 15, 2021
Subscribe: Apple | Spotify | Podbean | Google | Stitcher | TuneIn | RSS | More Platforms Here
SHOW LINKS:
JOIN TAC
Brutus XIII (21 Feb 1788)
Brutus XIV Part 1 (28 Feb 1788)
Part 2 (6 Mar 1788)
Paul E. McGreal – 2002 SMU Law Review
Saul Cornell – 2011 Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities
Nils Gilbertson – 2018 Georgetown Law
MORE VIDEO SOURCES
Watch on Odysee
FOLLOW and SUPPORT TAC:
Become a Member: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/members/
Email Newsletter: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/register
RSS: http://feeds.feedburner.com/tacdailydigest
VIDEO PLATFORMS
Odysee
YouTube
HypeTV
Brighteon
Gab TV
Bitchute
BitTube
DLive
Twitch
IGTV
SOCIAL PLATFORMS
Twitter
Minds
Facebook
Instagram
Gab
MeWe
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Hyprr
The post Subject to no Control: Antifederalist Brutus No. 13 and 14 first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
The Tenth Amendment Center works to preserve and protect Tenth Amendment freedoms through information and education. The center serves as a forum for the study and exploration of state and individual sovereignty issues, focusing primarily on the decentralization of federal government power. Visit https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/