Tesla Has Best 7 Day Stretch Since 2021, Rising 32%, Despite Mounting Tension Between Musk And SEC

Despite mounting tension between CEO Elon Musk and the Securities and Exchange Commission, Tesla had one of its best weeks in recent memory last week.

Heading into Friday’s session, where Tesla inched lower by about -0.3% on the day, the company’s stock was up for seven straight days. For the week, Tesla stock finished higher by almost 12%, after being up by as much as 15% mid-week. 

Over the 7 day period where Tesla rallied, its stock was up 32%.

It marked Tesla’s longest winning streak since January 2021, according to a Bloomberg wrap up published on Friday morning.

And Tesla’s move higher helped other EV names rise. Over a period spanning March 15, 2022 until Friday’s open last week, Rivian was higher by 31.5%, Nio was up by 47.2%, Xpeng was up by 36.7% and Lucid was higher by 19.4%. 

The run up in shares of Tesla came amidst a broader market rally and despite the fact that CEO Elon Musk faces mounting tensions with regulators. As we’ve reported over the last month, Musk is jousting with the SEC about whether or not he should still be beholden to his 2018 settlement agreement with the agency which required a “Twitter sitter” to review all of Musk’s online communications. 

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has said Musk has not met the “high burden” necessary to throw out the 2018 consent decree he is under, according to Reuters. Musk found compliance “less convenient than he had hoped,” the SEC argued, adding that “when it comes to civil settlements, a deal is a deal, absent far more compelling circumstances than are here presented.”

The SEC also argued against Musk’s bid to quash a subpoena concerning the Twitter poll he ran before selling 10% of his Tesla stock last year. Recall, earlier this month Musk had asked a federal judge to throw out his settlement with the SEC. Musk’s lawyers argued that the settlement, which famously required Musk to run his Tweets past a “Twitter sitter” as a consequence of faking an $80 billion buyout for Tesla, “has become unworkable”.

And in a sign that the SEC is currently a fly in Musk’s ointment, his lawyers said that the regulator was using the settlement to make “round after round of demands for voluminous, costly document productions, with no signs of abatement.”

Additionally, Musk called into question the SEC’s original claims that he defrauded shareholders in 2018. 

“I never lied to shareholders. I would never lie to shareholders. I entered the consent decree for the survival of Tesla, for the sake of its shareholders,” Musk said, claiming he felt “pressured” to settle with the SEC and put the matter behind him.

Donna Nagy, a law professor at Indiana University, told the WSJ: “It is exceedingly difficult to convince a federal court to terminate a consent decree. The showing required is very high and there is very recent precedent in an analogous area.”

Just weeks ago, we wrote that the SEC was probing Musk and his brother, Kimbal, over trades they executed in November 2021. The investigation began one day after Kimbal Musk sold $108 million in stock – which occurred one day before the Tesla CEO polled his Twitter users, on November 7 – just as the Russell and cryptos peaked – asking whether or not he should sell 10% of his stake in the company.

That vote then set Musk in motion to sell far in excess of $10 billion in stock, representing about 10% of his stake in Tesla. The Tesla CEO claimed the sale was a way to cover taxes for potential new capital gains laws.

After Elon started selling stock, Tesla’s stock price fell 33%. Regulators are reportedly probing whether or not Elon may have told his brother Kimbal about his planned Tweet and, if so, if Kimbal knowingly traded ahead of the event. 

Kimbal’s trading might “violate rules that generally prohibit employees and board members from trading on material nonpublic information”, the Wall Street Journal reported. Kimbal’s shares were not sold pursuant to a 10b5-1 plan, which would have dictated that he could sell at a predetermined interval. The probe is not guaranteed to result in an enforcement action.