The bloc also aims to move the country to “more modern NATO standard weapons,” the alliance’s Secretary General said
NATO is preparing to support Kiev “over a long period of time”, for as long as the military conflict in Ukraine will last “for months and years,” the alliance’s Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said on Thursday.
Speaking to a youth summit in Brussels, Stoltenberg said that it is in the hands of Russian President Vladimir Putin to stop the military action as it was him “who started the war.” Therefore, Stoltenberg said, Western countries will continue “to put maximum pressure on President Putin to end the war” by sanctioning Moscow and by providing economic and military support to Ukraine.
“It’s a very unpredictable and fragile situation in Ukraine, but there is absolutely the possibility that this war will drag on and last for months and years,” NATO’s head explained.
Taking this fact into account, the alliance, and its allies “are preparing to provide support over a long period of time and also help Ukraine to transit or move from old Soviet era equipment to more modern NATO standard weapons and systems,” Stoltenberg said.
Read more
He emphasized that such a transition requires additional training for the Ukrainian forces and better coordination of efforts between Kiev-supporting countries. In this context he welcomed the US proposal to conduct monthly talks with allies from and outside NATO on Ukraine’s self-defense.
Earlier this week, US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin admitted that, by helping Kiev, Washington wanted to see “Russia weakened to the degree that it can’t do the kinds of things that it has done in invading Ukraine.”
Moscow has consistently warned the West against “pumping up” Ukraine with weapons, arguing that such actions would only lead to a prolongation of military actions and would create longstanding problems in the future. The Kremlin also made it clear that any military hardware deliveries would be considered a legitimate target once they cross into Ukraine.
The NATO Secretary General also said that Ukraine will remain “a highly valued partner of NATO” and thus the alliance will support Kiev’s “Euro-Atlantic aspirations.” However, Stoltenberg made clear that any concrete negotiations in regard of Ukraine’s NATO membership bid would be possible only when the military conflict is over.
Ukraine’s potential NATO membership and the alliance’s expansion eastwards have been named by Moscow as one of the key reasons for the launch of its military operation. Russia views such developments as direct threats to its security and insists on a neutral status for Ukraine. After rounds of negotiations Kiev requests international security guarantees in exchange for the neutral status. As for now, the talks between Russia and Ukraine have apparently stalled. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov recently accused London and Washington of telling Kiev to backtrack on previously achieved agreements with Russia.
Russia sent its troops to Ukraine in late February, following Kiev’s failure to implement the terms of the Minsk agreements, first signed in 2014, and Moscow’s eventual recognition of the Donbass republics of Donetsk and Lugansk. The German and French brokered Minsk Protocol was designed to give the breakaway regions special status within the Ukrainian state.
The Kremlin has since demanded that Ukraine officially declare itself a neutral country that will never join NATO. Kiev insists the Russian offensive was completely unprovoked and has denied claims it was planning to retake the two republics by force.
The West responded to Russia’s attack by imposing tough sanctions. Moscow considers these measures “unlawful” and “unjustified.”
RT (Russia Today) is a state-owned news organization funded by the Russian government. The information provided by this news source is being included by the Libertarian Hub not as an endorsement of the Russian government, but rather because it is being actively censored by Big Tech, Western governments and the corporate press. During times of conflict it is imperative that we have access to both sides of the story so we can form our own opinions, even if both sides are spewing their own propaganda. The censorship of RT, despite likely being a propaganda outfit for the Russian government, reduces our ability to hear one side of the conflict. For that reason, the Libertarian Hub will temporarily republish the RSS feed from RT. Visit https://rt.com