The bill, introduced Friday, would create a state “digital communications division” and “digital communications commission” that would, among other things, “investigate and … hold hearings on claims … that a digital communications platform”—which includes “social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram and media-sharing platforms like YouTube and Twitch”—”has allowed a person to engage in one or more unfair or discriminatory digital communications practices on the platform,” including
- “practices that promote hate speech;
- undermine election integrity;
- disseminate intentional disinformation, conspiracy theories, or fake news; or
- authorize, encourage, or carry out violations of users’ privacy.”
None of these terms are defined in the bill. And the bill is all about suppressing the “unfair or discriminatory” speech:
If the adjudicator at the hearing determines that the respondent engaged in an unfair or discriminatory digital communications practice, the commission may issue and cause to be served on the respondent an order requiring the respondent to cease and desist from the practice and to take action that the commission orders.
Founded in 1968, Reason is the magazine of free minds and free markets. We produce hard-hitting independent journalism on civil liberties, politics, technology, culture, policy, and commerce. Reason exists outside of the left/right echo chamber. Our goal is to deliver fresh, unbiased information and insights to our readers, viewers, and listeners every day. Visit https://reason.com