The US billionaire questioned Riyadh’s record on freedom of speech after his buyout proposal was rejected
Billionaire Elon Musk has responded to Saudi Prince Al Waleed bin Talal, after he refused to sell his share in Twitter under the terms proposed by the American. The Tesla CEO made an offer to buy out Twitter for $41 billion, and the Saudi entrepreneur was the first major stock owner to say no.
Responding to Al Waleed’s public rejection of the bid, Musk tweeted two questions: “How much of Twitter does the Kingdom own, directly & indirectly?” and “What are the Kingdom’s views on journalistic freedom of speech?”
The Saudi businessman, one of the richest men in the Arab world, invested $300 million in Twitter in 2011. In 2015, after the company went public, he reported owning around 5% directly and through his firm, Kingdom Holding Company. He is currently estimated to own 4.4% of Twitter’s stock.
Musk became one of the largest Twitter shareholders after buying a 9.1% stake, a fact that he disclosed earlier this month. He rejected a seat on the company’s board and instead went for a hostile takeover.
He offered to buy out Twitter at $54.20 per share, well above its current market price of around $45. Al Waleed said on Thursday the offer does not reflect the “intrinsic value” of the platform if growth potential is considered.
The Vanguard Group currently holds the biggest stake in the microblogging service, according to the latest filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. It owns 10.3% of the firm.
Musk is a longtime Twitter user and has commented repeatedly on the company’s increasingly restrictive rules on what kinds of speech are allowed on the platform.
Many fans of Musk have been hoping that with him in charge, Twitter could roll back many of its restrictions and return to being a platform for free speech. Many critics of Musk’s move, however, say the platform needs to do more to censor what they deem ‘misinformation’, fearing that Musk could undermine that goal.
RT (Russia Today) is a state-owned news organization funded by the Russian government. The information provided by this news source is being included by the Libertarian Hub not as an endorsement of the Russian government, but rather because it is being actively censored by Big Tech, Western governments and the corporate press. During times of conflict it is imperative that we have access to both sides of the story so we can form our own opinions, even if both sides are spewing their own propaganda. The censorship of RT, despite likely being a propaganda outfit for the Russian government, reduces our ability to hear one side of the conflict. For that reason, the Libertarian Hub will temporarily republish the RSS feed from RT. Visit https://rt.com
