The International Federation of Journalists argued that “unregulated speech” on the social media network would harm quality journalism
The International Federation of Journalists on Tuesday condemned SpaceX tycoon Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter, arguing that his support of free speech is somehow “bad news for media freedom.”
Musk finalized the purchase of the social media giant on Monday, paying $44 billion to take sole ownership. He promised to root out spam and bots by authenticating human users, and to make the platform a bastion of free speech.
Musk’s buyout was condemned by both the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ). In a joint statement, titled ‘Twitter: Elon Musk’s deal is bad news for media freedom,’ the federations raised concerns that placing Twitter in “the hands of a single individual would have serious consequences over the social and political use of the platform.”
They warned that Musk’s plan to “authenticate all humans” would have repercussions for journalists and their sources who depend on anonymity, and that his plans to allow “unregulated speech on Twitter without moderation will increase disinformation and threaten quality journalism.”
By lessening content moderation, the federations argued that “journalists, in particular women, and those belonging to minority groups” could be harassed online.
While the IFJ regularly criticizes governments around the world for curtailing free speech, its general secretary, Anthony Bellanger, said on Tuesday that speech on Twitter “must be duly moderated.”
“It is high time to regulate the ownership of media and social networks in order to counteract a concentration of power that is harmful to pluralism, public debate and democracy,” EFJ General Secretary Ricardo Guitterez added.
RT (Russia Today) is a state-owned news organization funded by the Russian government. The information provided by this news source is being included by the Libertarian Hub not as an endorsement of the Russian government, but rather because it is being actively censored by Big Tech, Western governments and the corporate press. During times of conflict it is imperative that we have access to both sides of the story so we can form our own opinions, even if both sides are spewing their own propaganda. The censorship of RT, despite likely being a propaganda outfit for the Russian government, reduces our ability to hear one side of the conflict. For that reason, the Libertarian Hub will temporarily republish the RSS feed from RT. Visit https://rt.com
