Brussels is looking forward to receiving Kiev’s answers to the union membership questionnaire, the EU Commission head says
The future of Europe is that of Ukraine as well, the European Commission head, Ursula von der Leyen, told the European Parliament in Strasbourg on Monday, adding that the “next page” in the history of the bloc will be written by Ukrainians.
The EU Commission chief said Brussels is looking forward to receiving Ukraine’s answers to the membership questionnaire. Earlier, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said that Kiev had submitted the 5,000-page document to the EU.
The commission aims to deliver its opinion on the matter in June, von der Leyen tweeted.
Followed up on yesterday’s G7 discussion with @ZelenskyyUa
On #EuropeDay, we discussed EU support and Ukraine’s European pathway.
Looking forward to receiving the answers to the EU membership questionnaire.
The @EU_Commission will aim to deliver its opinion in June. pic.twitter.com/KkQuodJjj4
— Ursula von der Leyen (@vonderleyen) May 9, 2022
However, French President Emmanuel Macron, who was also present at the European Parliament session, warned that Kiev should not expect speedy accession to the bloc. “Even if we gave them [Ukraine] candidate status tomorrow… we all know perfectly well that the process of allowing them to join would take several years… several decades,” he said.
Read more
Earlier in May, a similar idea was expressed by Austria’s EU affairs minister, Karoline Edtstadler, who said Ukraine’s accession to the EU was unlikely to happen “in the next five to ten years.”
The French leader said he opposes the idea of the bloc lowering its “stringent” standards just to allow some nations to join sooner. Instead, he suggested establishing another format that would involve those aspiring to join the EU and, in an apparent reference to the UK, those nations that have already left it.
“It is our historic obligation… to create what I would describe before you today as a European political community,” Macron said, adding that this new “organization” would allow “democratic European nations” to cooperate in the fields of politics, security, energy, transport, investment, and infrastructure. The French president argued that the EU cannot remain Europe’s only organizing body, “given its level of integration and ambition.” He did not elaborate, however, on the format this new organization would have.
Both Macron and von der Leyen have also advocated for changing EU treaties. “We need to reform our texts – it’s obvious,” the French president said. Von der Leyen argued that “unanimity voting” should become a thing of the past “if we want to move faster,” since it “no longer makes sense” in certain areas.
We need to go even further.
For example, I have always argued that unanimity voting in some key areas no longer makes sense, if we want to move faster.
Europe should also play a greater role in health or defence. pic.twitter.com/Tdeg6jIcWw
— Ursula von der Leyen (@vonderleyen) May 9, 2022
The idea, however, faced criticism from EU members that said now is not the time for “institutional discussions,” and called any potential treaty changes “unconsidered and premature.” Those opposing the initiative included Denmark, Sweden, Poland, the Czech Republic, and the Baltic states.
Thank you for democratic debate & inspiring ideas at #CoFE 🗳💡 But 🇧🇬🇨🇿🇭🇷🇩🇰🇪🇪🇫🇮🇱🇻🇱🇹🇲🇹🇵🇱🇷🇴🇸🇮🇸🇪 against unconsidered & premature Treaty change. Europe must deliver real results. No time for institutional discussions! 📣 #eudk pic.twitter.com/JgpmAxxTG4
— Denmark in the EU (@DKinEU) May 9, 2022
Ukraine submitted the first part of the questionnaire in mid-April. In assessing membership bids, the European Commission evaluates everything from the country’s economic performance to the legal system, along with environmental regulations and agricultural practices. This process can take decades – Turkey has, for example, been a candidate since 1999.
Full membership is also dependent on the unanimous consent of EU member states.
RT (Russia Today) is a state-owned news organization funded by the Russian government. The information provided by this news source is being included by the Libertarian Hub not as an endorsement of the Russian government, but rather because it is being actively censored by Big Tech, Western governments and the corporate press. During times of conflict it is imperative that we have access to both sides of the story so we can form our own opinions, even if both sides are spewing their own propaganda. The censorship of RT, despite likely being a propaganda outfit for the Russian government, reduces our ability to hear one side of the conflict. For that reason, the Libertarian Hub will temporarily republish the RSS feed from RT. Visit https://rt.com