A U.S.–Taliban deal will leave many American troops in Afghanistan. “Under the proposed deal, the initial withdrawal would include roughly 5,000 of the 14,000 U.S. troops in the country,” The Washington Post reported Thursday.
“We’re going to keep a presence there,” Trump told Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade yesterday. “We’re reducing that presence very substantially. We’re not fighting a war over there. We’re just policemen.”
But this comes after an announcement from Trump last December that the U.S. would be withdrawing 7,00 from Afghanistan within weeks. That didn’t pan out. The new plan is the latest in what’s becoming a Trumpian habit: promising a different path than his predecessors in places like Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, only to cave to the more militaristic forces in his party and in the broader media/corporate/political establishment.
In this case, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R–S.C.) has been one of the harshest critics of Trump’s impulses to pull back the U.S. presence in Afghanistan and the Middle East. “Graham, one of Trump’s closest allies on Capitol Hill, has repeatedly warned the president not to trust the Taliban to control al-Qaeda and other militant groups in Afghanistan,” notes the Post:
Some within the Trump administration have sent the same message. Trump has maintained that bringing U.S. troops home from Afghanistan is his long-term priority. On Sunday, Graham said Trump and his would-be 2020 Democratic presidential rivals are “all wrong” on the issue.
Graham—a security hysteric of epic proportions—also chastised Trump about Afghanistan in a Washington Post op-ed on Wednesday.
People in the Trump administration said earlier this month that the president still wants all U.S. troops out of Afghanistan by 2020.
And so here “is where we find ourselves,” as Matt Welch wrote in the July issue of Reason:
with a president who accurately declares in his State of the Union address that “great nations do not fight endless wars,” even while 14,000 of the troops under his command still suffer and inflict death more than 200 months (and 2,300 Americans killed) after U.S. forces first overthrew the Taliban government.
“We should leave Afghanistan immediately,” Trump tweeted as far back as March 2013. “No more wasted lives.” He was right then, and presumably still leans that way now.
Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) thinks the “problem is that several of his advisers that he has appointed don’t necessarily agree with him. So they either countermand his sentiments or talk him into delaying.”
The American people are more in line with Paul’s impulses than with those of forever-warmongers like Graham. As Lucy Steigerwald wrote here in January:
The long life of the Afghan war makes it hard to remember how popular it was when it began. As the fighting began, 80 percent of America supported it. Nobody in Congress except Rep. Barbara Lee (D–Calif.) was prescient enough to vote against the Authorization for Use of Military Force and its open-ended-enough-to-attack-a-dozen-more-countries wording. Not until 2014 did a majority of Americans begin to regret that the war ever started.
Speaking of both wars, people have been calling B.S. on Wisconsin Republican Gov. Scott Walker’s recent attempt to slam Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–N.Y.) Walker tweeted “How many members of the true Greatest Generation fought and died so @AOC and her generation could have the peace & prosperity they enjoy today?” This, critics note, makes light of millennial military service in Iraq and Afghanistan.
It’s amazing how prone Republicans are to ignore the more than two million veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, most of whom are millennials. https://t.co/20EWb19Vc3
— Sandra Newman (@sannewman) August 30, 2019
We’re at peace? We’ve been at war for nearly two decades – two thirds of this millennial’s life. https://t.co/V8oKatbSHy
— Joy Powers (@thejoypowers) August 29, 2019
we’ve been at war for 18 years. the authorization for use of military force that started that war has been invoked to justify actions in 20 (!) different countries. a service member born after 9/11 (not a millennial!) will likely die in this war sometime soon. https://t.co/x37Qj3nZyx
— Paul Blumenthal (@PaulBlu) August 29, 2019
You do realize I have millennial brothers and sisters who have died serving this country? Is that the peace and prosperity that the greatest generation paved for us like you say? Just stop. https://t.co/vMwRGbxGPV
— Joe Leatherman (@speak_in_vowels) August 29, 2019
And while Trump has been talking down these military misadventures, his actions don’t always reflect the same. As Brian Doherty pointed out here last year, “if you’re assessing how serious a peacenik Trump is prepared to be, you should contemplate some hard facts about Washington’s longest-lasting active war: the U.S.-led operations in Afghanistan.”
According to an interesting analysis that Niall McCarthy of Statista has done of Air Force Central Command data, 2018—the first full year that the Trump administration has run the Afghanistan coalition—saw in just its first nine months more bombs dropped on Afghanistan than any other year in the history of the war: 5,213. The entire year of 2010, the previous record, saw just 5,101.
The number of bombs dropped had declined to 947 in 2015; in 2016, it was 1,337. But after “Trump announced a new Afghan strategy last August and committed more troops to the country,” McCarthy writes, “the number of bombs dropped by the U.S. coalition has surged dramatically.”
Sexting illegal in Texas without affirmative consent. Texas is enacting a law making it illegal to text or direct message someone an unsolicited image of a “sexually explicit” nature. “Many people—especially women—get unwanted sexually explicit pictures by text or social media. It’s disgusting. Now, it’s illegal in Texas,” wrote Republican Gov. Greg Abbott last Friday.
The law, which takes effect September 1, makes it illegal to send any sexually explicit imagery that “is not sent at the request of or with the express consent of the recipient.” What could go wrong…?
Elizabeth Warren’s “economic patriotism” is just protectionism dressed up in a different phrase, writes J.D. Tuccille. We’re already seeing the negative effects of this tendency in the Trump administration, with its “America First” economics.
“There’s no reason to believe other countries will be more receptive to a hypothetical President Warren’s foreigner-bashing and trade-tinkering just because she sticks a different brand name on bad policy,” writes Tuccille. “Protectionism and nationalism would still draw retaliation.”
- “Can a minor legally engaged in consensual sexual activity be his or her own pornographer through the act of sexting?” Yes, rules Maryland’s top court by a vote of 6–1.
- The National Law Review says “2019 has quietly been an important year for CDA jurisprudence with a number of opinions enunciating robust immunity under CDA Section 230.” Relatedly:
— Legal Talk Network (@LegalTalkNet) August 29, 2019
- An incarcerated woman who says she was forced to give birth behind bars without medical attention is suing the Denver County Jail.
- “Your right to free speech does not automatically mean that people will agree with you. In fact, you have an absolute God-given and inalienable right to be on the losing end of this argument,” U.S. Attorney Justin Herdman told a room full of Ohio police chiefs yesterday.
- A federal drug agent got someone to buy a truck so that the agent could seize it in a bust and use it for his own work.
- The next forefront of the prostitution decriminalization movement may be Utah.
Founded in 1968, Reason is the magazine of free minds and free markets. We produce hard-hitting independent journalism on civil liberties, politics, technology, culture, policy, and commerce. Reason exists outside of the left/right echo chamber. Our goal is to deliver fresh, unbiased information and insights to our readers, viewers, and listeners every day. Visit https://reason.com
This post has been republished with implied permission from a publicly-available RSS feed found on Reason. The views expressed by the original author(s) do not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of The Libertarian Hub, its owners or administrators. Any images included in the original article belong to and are the sole responsibility of the original author/website. The Libertarian Hub makes no claims of ownership of any imported photos/images and shall not be held liable for any unintended copyright infringement. Submit a DCMA takedown request.