Earlier today, Hong Kong’s Chief Executive Carrie Lam withdrew the controversial extradition bill that set off protests 13 weeks ago.
The bill would have allowed Hong Kong to extradite suspected criminals to both Taiwan and mainland China. Since 1997, Hong Kong has technically been considered part of China, but was granted significant autonomy through the “one country, two systems” policy, which allows Hongkongers to enjoy basic democratic freedoms. The extradition bill, which was tabled several months ago but not formally withdrawn until now, would have winnowed away at Hong Kong’s autonomy.
Though full withdrawal of the extradition bill is a genuine concession, Lam’s decision fulfilled only one of the protesters’ demands and many pro-democracy dissidents warn that this is not a full victory, but partial appeasement.
The protesters still want the Hong Kong government to address the increasing use of force by police and the lack of free and fair elections. They also want Hong Kong to release people who have been arrested in connection with the protests, and for Lam, who the protesters see as a puppet of Beijing, to step down.
Everyone, this is NOT a victory for Hongkongers. The common sentiment among the people is : Too little, Too late.
For those who don’t understand, just ask Carrie Lam to answer one question : why now, why not 3 months ago? Any immediate pressures coming from other countries?
— Denise Ho (HOCC) (@hoccgoomusic) September 4, 2019
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
By throwing crumbs at us, she is continuously insulting the collective wisdom of Hongkongers.
We will not accept anything less than the 5 demands, that has been our message since the beginning. This is a fight for freedom and democracy, HKers will fight on, united as ever.#hk
— Denise Ho (HOCC) (@hoccgoomusic) September 4, 2019
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
The protesters’ additional demands—notably the calls for fully free and democratic elections—were at the core of the 2014 “umbrella movement” protests. Yet Lam is still in charge and candidates for chief executive are still pre-screened and approved by mainland China.
The conflict over mainland China’s influence on Hong Kong will pop up again in the future, particularly since Hong Kong’s semi-autonomy rests on a 50-year-long treaty that expires in 2047.
4. Imagine: How much more sacrifices and injustice will Hongkongers have to endure to bring down another unjust law or policy proposal in future, which is very much foreseeable given our undemocratic govt.?
— Brian Leung Kai-Ping (@BrianLe08711226) September 4, 2019
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
8. Protestors do not see the withdrawal as a victory. And the situation is not de-escalating. What we need is concrete institutional guarantee, not some personal string-pulling to rid oneself of responsibilities and intl. pressure.
— Brian Leung Kai-Ping (@BrianLe08711226) September 4, 2019
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
“Incidents over these past two months have shocked and saddened Hong Kong people,” Lam said in a broadcast. “We are all very anxious about Hong Kong, our home. We all hope to find a way out of the current impasse and unsettling times.”
More Reason coverage of the Hong Kong protests here.
Founded in 1968, Reason is the magazine of free minds and free markets. We produce hard-hitting independent journalism on civil liberties, politics, technology, culture, policy, and commerce. Reason exists outside of the left/right echo chamber. Our goal is to deliver fresh, unbiased information and insights to our readers, viewers, and listeners every day. Visit https://reason.com