What are the cases in the Constitutional Canon?
In our new book, Randy Barnett and I selected the 100 cases that we think belong in the “constitutional canon.” This process was quite difficult, and we had to make extremely difficult cuts. Some topics were excluded altogether. For example, we did not consider constitutional criminal procedure cases, as well as related cases involving the death penalty. We also omitted political-process decisions about redistricting, voting rights, etc. Even among the topics we selected, there were many tough cuts.
We compared our list to the coverage in twelve of the leading constitutional law casebooks. Here are the results, sorted by the texts that included the greatest number of our 100 cases:
- Choper, Dorf, Fallon, and Schauer: 80 cases
- Stone, Seidman, Sunstein, Tushnet, & Karlan: 73 cases
- Chemerinsky: 71 cases
- Maggs & Smith: 69 cases
- Farmer, Eskridge, Frickey, and Schacter: 68 cases
- Varat & Amar: 67 cases
- Brest, Levinson, Balkin, Amar, & Siegel: 64 cases
- Feldman & Sullivan: 64 cases
- Paulsen, Calabresi, McConnell, Bray, and Baude: 63 cases
- Weaver, Friedland, Hancock, Fair, Knechtle, & Rosen: 59 cases
- Massey & Denning: 57 cases
- Rotunda: 54 cases
An Introduction to Constitutional Law would make an excellent supplement for every casebook on the market. Please let us know if you are a professor (law or undergraduate), and would like a review copy.
We divided our book into 15 parts. This spreadsheet compares the coverage in each part, to the other leading casebooks. We included primary cases that are listed in the table of contents, and did not mention cases mentioned in passing in the notes. (Students frankly never read the squibs–our casebook excludes them.) The titles highlighted in red are published by Wolters Kluwer (our publisher). The titles highlighted in blue are published by West Academic Press.
Every casebook covered Marbury, McCulloch, and Gibbons. Five casebooks covered Barron. Only one other case taught Chisholm. This latter case, the Supreme Court’s first major constitutional decision, is almost certainly included in Federal Courts texts.
Part II is, by far, the most thorough section in our book. Almost all of the casebooks included McCulloch and Gibbons. To our surprises, only two casebooks discuss Prigg, a foundational case about implied powers. None of the books covered enumerated powers on the Chase Court, including Dewitt, and the seminal Legal Tender cases (Hepburn and Knox). Almost all of the books pick up in the Progressive Era, with E.C. Knight, Champion, and Hammer. The coverage across the New Deal is consistent: Schechter Poultry, Jones & Laughlin Steel, Darby, and Wickard. The two leading cases from the Warren Court–Heart of Atlanta and Katzenbach are well represented. (Though, more books include the latter than the former.) Virtually every book included Lopez; several omitted Morrison and Raich. Every book included NFIB.
Most casebooks included the leading commandeering cases: New York and Printz. Only two cases discussed Hans, and none covered Seminole Tribe. Boerne was included in every case, and there was sparse coverage of following cases, like Garrett and Hibbs.
Only two other books covered Ex Parte Merryman. A few books included the Prize Cases, which we opted to exclude. Every book included Youngstown. Though, much to our surprise, a handful of books excluded Korematsu. Most books did not mention the companion case, Ex Parte Endo.
We were shocked that four casebooks excluded Dred Scott. We were pleased that almost every book covered Slaughter-House. Alas, only thee taught Bradwell, an important follow-up case on the Privileges or Immunities Clause. And only Brest/Levinson included Cruikshank. Five casebooks covered Strauder. Every book included the Civil Rights Cases. And most books included Yick Wo and Plessy.
The coverage on Due Process cases was quite inconsistent. Every casebook covered Lochner. Only two included Muller. And only one mentioned Buchanan v. Warley. Half of the books covered Meyer and Pierce. All but one taught Buck. Only we consider O’Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. (1931). This case teaches that the Court’s shift away Adkins began prior to Roosevelt’s election. Among the New Deal cases, about half the books included Nebbia, West Coast Hotel, and Carolene Products. Several books discussed Footnote Four, but excluded the actual case it was delivered in. To my surprise, eight books covered Lee Optical.
The eight cases we selected were consistently included in all of the casebooks. Every book had Brown. Though only seven included Bolling. Most books discussed Cooper and Loving. Bakke still has good coverage. Ditto for the more recent affirmative action cases, Grutter, Gratz, and Fisher.[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCqp0wZ6XuA?feature=oembed&w=500&h=281]
Most of the books covered Frontiero, and almost every book included Craig and Virginia. Cleburne and Romer (the “other” cases) had solid representation. Given Windsor and Obergefell, I suspect these two cases will slowly fade away.
The casebooks had uniform coverage on modern substantive due process. Every text included Griswold, Roe, and Casey. Most of the books included Whole Woman’s Health (and those that didn’t may have included it in recent supplements). The LGBT cases were also uniformly included: Lawrence and Obergefell. Most books now excluded Windsor. (We labored about whether to omit that case, but decided to include it as a bridge from Lawrence to Obergefell).
Many 1L ConLaw classes do not cover the First Amendment. Some classes cover it, only briefly. Yet, almost all of the leading casebooks had fairly thorough coverage in this space. (Brest/Levinson does not discuss the First Amendment.) Most books covered the foundational quartet from the early 20th century: Schenck, Debs, Abrams, and Gitlow. None covered Stromberg, the first case in which a state law was found to violate the Freedom of Speech. Most books also covered O’Brien, Texas v. Johnson, and R.A.V. Buckley and Citizens United were well covered; a few added McConnell v. FEC. Sullivan, which most students also learn in Torts, was in most books. Finally, most books included the leading cases from the Roberts Court: Snyder, Stevens, and EMA.
The casebooks had far less discussion of the Free Exercise Clause than the Free Speech Clause. Half of the books included Sherbert. Others included Yoder. (We preferred Sherbert over Yoder because the former helps to explain the post-RFRA standard.) Almost every book added Employment Division. Fewer cases added Lukumi. We added Hobby Lobby. Though not a constitutional decision, RFRA illustrates how most modern Free Exercise Clause cases are litigated.
This topic had considerable divergence among the casebooks. We decided to only include the leading monument cases: McCreary County and Van Orden. (The Bladensburg Cross, decided after our book went to press, was far too fragmented to be included). We did not include public prayer cases like Town of Greece and Weisman. We also did not include school funding cases like Engel v. Vitale.
Part XIV: The Right to Keep and Bear Arms
Almost all law students learn takings in Property. We do not have a sense of how many students also learn that topic in Constitutional Law. (I cover it in Property II.) As a result, we included three basic cases to give students a brief introduction to regulatory and physical takings: Penn. Coal, Penn Central, and Kelo. Most casebooks excluded this topic altogether.
This post has been republished with permission from a publicly-available RSS feed found on Reason. The views expressed by the original author(s) do not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of The Libertarian Hub, its owners or administrators. Any images included in the original article belong to and are the sole responsibility of the original author/website. The Libertarian Hub makes no claims of ownership of any imported photos/images and shall not be held liable for any unintended copyright infringement. Submit a DCMA takedown request.