Today, a Seventh Circuit panel, per Judge Easterbrook, upheld Indiana University’s vaccine mandate. (Eugene blogged about it here). The Court distinguished the school-wide mandate at issue in Indiana with the population-wide mandate in Jacobson:
Second, Indiana does not require every adult member of the public to be vaccinated, as Massachusetts did in Jacobson. Vaccination is instead a condition of attending Indiana University. People who do not want to be vaccinated may go elsewhere.
More than a century ago, Henning Jacobson agreed. He argued before the Supreme Court that school-wide vaccine mandates are permissible, because schools can choose who attend. By contrast, Jacobson argued against the population-wide mandate.
Here an excerpt from his brief:
Stay tuned for more, from my forthcoming article, The Irrepressible Myth of Jacobson v. Massachusetts.
Founded in 1968, Reason is the magazine of free minds and free markets. We produce hard-hitting independent journalism on civil liberties, politics, technology, culture, policy, and commerce. Reason exists outside of the left/right echo chamber. Our goal is to deliver fresh, unbiased information and insights to our readers, viewers, and listeners every day. Visit https://reason.com