On Sunday, nearly 2/3 of voters in Switzerland approved a referendum to approve same-sex marriage. Also on Sunday, more than 3/4 of voters in San Marino approved a referendum to legalize first-trimester abortions.
Imagine that. Change occurred through the democratic process, and not the judicial process.
But wait! Didn’t Obergefell–favorably citing West Virginia v. Barnett–hold that “fundamental rights may not be submitted to a vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.” Of course, the passage from Justice Jackson’s landmark opinion focused on enumerated provisions in the Bill of Rights, and not unenumerated substantive due process rights. Indeed, Justice Jackson explained that “[m]uch of the vagueness of the due process clause disappears when the specific prohibitions of the First [Amendment] become its standard.” But details were not important for Justice Kennedy. His obligation was to “define the liberty of all.”
Founded in 1968, Reason is the magazine of free minds and free markets. We produce hard-hitting independent journalism on civil liberties, politics, technology, culture, policy, and commerce. Reason exists outside of the left/right echo chamber. Our goal is to deliver fresh, unbiased information and insights to our readers, viewers, and listeners every day. Visit https://reason.com