As a mob of angry supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol building, former President Donald Trump demanded that Secret Service agents take him to the riot. He even tried to grab the wheel of the car in which he was riding. That’s according to testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson, a former White House aide who worked for Mark Meadows, Trump’s final chief of staff. Hutchinson made a surprise appearance at the January 6 committee hearings on Tuesday and described the former’s president’s allegedly agitated and irresponsible behavior before, during, and after the attack on the Capitol.
Hutchinson told the committee that Trump threw his lunch at a wall when he learned that former Attorney General William Barr had publicly declined to endorse any stolen election claims. “There was ketchup dripping down the wall,” she said.
“There was ketchup dripping down the wall.” Cassidy Hutchinson says then-President Donald Trump threw his lunch against a wall when he learned of an @AP article in which then-Attorney General William Barr said the DOJ had not found evidence of voter fraud. https://t.co/0WDFU8fj8E pic.twitter.com/A7LiiB8NAL
— The Associated Press (@AP) June 28, 2022
Before giving his speech on January 6, Trump told his aides not to bother checking members of the crowd for weapons, saying “they are not here to hurt me,” according to Hutchinson.
Meadows and other senior officials were well aware that mayhem could ensue, according to the Associated Press:
In one gripping scene Hutchinson recalled walking Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani out of the White House when he asked if she was “excited about the 6th.”
“We’re going to the Capitol, it’s going to be great, the president’s going to be there, he’s going to look powerful,” she recalled Giuliani saying.
When she returned inside and told Meadows of that conversation, he told her a lot was going on.
“Things might get real, real bad,” Meadows told her, she recalled.
Mick Mulvaney, former acting chief of staff for Trump, described the president’s awareness that the protesters were armed as “very, very bad,” though it was not a crime for the protesters to carry weapons outside the Capitol; protesting while armed is just the First Amendment plus the Second Amendment.
A stunning 2 hours:
1)Trump knew the protesters had guns
2)He assaulted his own security team
3)There may be a line from ProudBoys to the WH
4)Top aides asked for pardons
5)The commission thinks they have evidence of witness tampering.
That is a very, very bad day for Trump.
— Mick Mulvaney (@MickMulvaney) June 28, 2022
The Dispatch‘s David French thinks Hutchinson’s testimony raises the possibility that Trump could actually be prosecuted for incitement:
First, Trump summoned the mob to Washington. While Trump is hardly the only organizer of the January 6 rally, he did explicitly call his supporters to Washington, and he did so in a way that implied mayhem. On December 19, 2020, he tweeted, “Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild.
Second, he knew the mob was armed and dangerous. This is Hutchinson’s key testimony. If her claims are true, he was so confident that the mob intended him no harm that he wanted to remove the “mags,” a key element of presidential security. He didn’t just know the mob was armed, he wanted it to be armed.
Third, he not only exhorted the mob to “fight like hell” and march on the Capitol, he reportedly attempted to lead it himself.
As French concedes, however, Trump also exhorted his followers to march “peacefully and patriotically.” French describes that comment as “pro forma ass-covering,” but the “fight like hell” comment did not actually accompany a command to enter the Capitol—Trump merely instructed his followers to march to the Capitol, which was not a crime, even if Trump knew members of his mob were armed.
Other aspects of Trump’s behavior are also under scrutiny. When he learned about the attack on the Capitol, he demanded to be driven to the building. Secret Service refused, prompting Trump to reach for the wheel of the vehicle, according to Hutchinson.
Debates broke out on social media as to whether this detail is actually possible, with some Trumpian figures—including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R–Ga.)—alleging that it isn’t. On the other hand, Trump apparently left the January 6 rally in his SUV, rather than the presidential limo, and was plausibly seated within striking distance of the wheel.
Trump left the Jan. 6 rally in the SUV version of the Beast, fwiw, as opposed to the limo.
He appears to be sitting in the rear passenger seat. Hutchinson testified she was told he grabbed at the wheel, then at the “clavicles” of an agent, as he demanded to go to the Capitol. pic.twitter.com/nTZw48ToD9
— Josh Wingrove (@josh_wingrove) June 28, 2022
According to NBC News, the Secret Service is prepared to rebut the charge:
???? A source close to the Secret Service tells me both Bobby Engel, the lead agent, and the presidential limousine/SUV driver are prepared to testify under oath that neither man was assaulted and that Mr. Trump never lunged for the steering wheel.
— Peter Alexander (@PeterAlexander) June 28, 2022
The January 6 hearings do not constitute a trial, of course: Trump will not be made available to argue his side of the story, or to contradict claims made about him. It is easy for witness testimony to seem damning in the absence of cross-examination. In lieu of that, the public must make do with Trump’s response on his social media platform Truth Social, where he blasted Hutchinson as “very negative” and also “bad news,” while simultaneously asserting that he hardly knew her.
CNN analyst Chris Cillizza described the revelations as “utterly devastating” for Trump. It has, of course, already been well-established that Trump’s false statements about the validity of the 2020 election stoked the mob, and his failure to swiftly condemn the violence was inexcusable. It was so bad that many of his most prominent supporters tried desperately to contact him about it while it was happening. His own family members were aghast.
But the reality of the matter is that there’s no middle ground when it comes to Trump. His detractors have overwhelming evidence to support the view that he is one of the most irresponsible public figures in the country’s history. His supporters, on the other hand, are pleased with his record—social conservatives just scored their biggest victory in half a century, thanks to Trump’s Supreme Court appointments—and won’t change their minds just because January 6 is being re-litigated yet again.
A spokesperson for Facebook said some posts detailing how to obtain abortion pills were incorrectly taken down. An earlier report by Vice had discovered that Facebook would remove posts containing the phrase “abortion pills can be mailed.” When the word abortion was swapped for guns or marijuana, the posts survived, according to the Associated Press.
While that may sound suspicious, Facebook has a broad policy against using the platform to sell or send pharmaceuticals.
Content that attempts to buy, sell, trade, gift, request or donate pharmaceuticals is not allowed. Content that discusses the affordability and accessibility of prescription medication is allowed. We’ve discovered some instances of incorrect enforcement and are correcting these.
— Andy Stone (@andymstone) June 27, 2022
Federal Communications Commission head Brendan Carr called on Apple and Google to ban TikTok from their app stores due to concerns that the Chinese-owned company could be sharing users’ information with its authoritarian government. “It is clear that TikTok poses an unacceptable national security risk due to its extensive data harvesting being combined with Beijing’s apparently unchecked access to that sensitive data,” wrote Carr in an open letter to Google and Apple.
TikTok is not just another video app.
That’s the sheep’s clothing.
It harvests swaths of sensitive data that new reports show are being accessed in Beijing.
— Brendan Carr (@BrendanCarrFCC) June 28, 2022
Carr is right that TikTok’s massive popularity—it is now the world’s most visited website—raises some legitimate national security concerns, given the Chinese government’s control over it. As Matthew Yglesias wrote for Slow Boring, China’s ability to control the political narrative on TikTok is significant: Government censors can prohibit discussions of certain topics and besiege users with pro-Chinese propaganda. There’s already evidence that when it came to the COVID-19 pandemic, the platform did just that.
Of course, the U.S. government is not without its hypocrisies. The Biden administration, as well as members of Congress from both parties, have frequently urged social media companies like Facebook, Twitter, and Google to make specific content moderation decisions. The White House repeatedly pressed Facebook, for instance, to take down so-called “misinformation” relating to COVID-19 even though many of the government’s talking points on the efficacy of masks and the origins of the disease have proven to be untrue, or more complicated than previously admitted.
It’s appropriate to warn the public about the unique challenges posed by Chinese control of a major social media company. At the same time, the U.S. has handled its social media companies in increasingly illiberal ways.
- Authorities have charged two Mexican nationals in connection with the deaths of 51 migrants who perished from extreme heat inside a tractor-trailer in San Antonio.
- Turkey is okay with adding Finland and Sweden to NATO.
- A judge has sentenced Ghislaine Maxwell to 20 years in prison for helping Jeffrey Epstein sexually assault underage women.
- Some Medieval Times employees want to unionize the company.
- A Boston Globe article claims that there’s an epidemic of “roofied” drinks at Boston bars—which is almost certainly false.
The post January 6 Hearings Reveal More Trump Misconduct, but Was It Incitement? appeared first on Reason.com.
Founded in 1968, Reason is the magazine of free minds and free markets. We produce hard-hitting independent journalism on civil liberties, politics, technology, culture, policy, and commerce. Reason exists outside of the left/right echo chamber. Our goal is to deliver fresh, unbiased information and insights to our readers, viewers, and listeners every day. Visit https://reason.com
This post has been republished with implied permission from a publicly-available RSS feed found on Reason. The views expressed by the original author(s) do not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of The Libertarian Hub, its owners or administrators. Any images included in the original article belong to and are the sole responsibility of the original author/website. The Libertarian Hub makes no claims of ownership of any imported photos/images and shall not be held liable for any unintended copyright infringement. Submit a DCMA takedown request.